Two Year-Old “Bad Guy”

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Pin on PinterestShare on LinkedInEmail this to someone

Our youngest daughter has an issue. She’s admitted it, to be sure. She may recover. Unfortunately, she seems to relish the problem. You see, she’s “bad guy.” No, she’s not a bad guy or just any bad guy. She’s Bad Guy — apparently the one, the only. This is her preferred self-description and title.

“Bad Guy likes oranges,” she declared to her mother the other day.

Emmeline had been saying this often enough that my dear wife was a bit tired of it.

“We don’t have any oranges. Besides, this ‘Bad Guy’ thing is driving me nuts!” Angela blurted, only half-jokingly.

“Oooooo,” Emmeline excitedly grinned, “Bad Guy likes nuts!”

Yea, sometimes Emmeline’s that fast. We can’t win.

Later I asked our eldest daughter if she knew how Emmeline came to such a self-appellation. Elizabeth explained that one day she and Katherine were playing and had made Emmeline “the bad guy.” “Quick, run from the bad guy,” they exclaimed as they dashed from the room, Emmeline huffing behind them, willingly adopting the epithet.

Well, it stuck! For how long, we don’t know.

What we do know is that a “bad” characterization makes for a corruption of company.

Dalrymple, Burgess and A Clockwork Britain

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Pin on PinterestShare on LinkedInEmail this to someone

Theodore Dalrymple (whom I recommended in a previous post) has written an unnerving piece on life in Britain. He keys the essay off of Anthony Burgess’s controversial novel, A Clockwork Orange. In, “Oh to Be in England: A Prophetic and Violent Materpiece,” Dalrymple escorts us through the erie story line of the novel Burgess most disliked, and then brings it to enlighten the ways and means of a significant faction of youth culture in Britain (some of which we’ve witnessed).

Continue…

It’s the Demography, Stupid!

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Pin on PinterestShare on LinkedInEmail this to someone

Mark Steyn’s at it again!”The Real Reason Why the West Is in Danger,” is the subtitle for Steyn’s recent piece in the Wall Street Journal’s Editorial Page, Opinion Journal. “The design flaw of the secular social-democratic state is that it requires a religious-society birthrate to sustain it. Post-Christian hyperrationalism is, in the objective sense, a lot less rational than Catholicism or Mormonism.”

Ouch! But isn’t that the truth?

Continue…